i-Star Variance; Lincoln/SeaPointe

Yes, many months later, we are still peeved about the the i-Star variance.  The wound opened by some recent press about the SeaPointe Tower’s developer’s suit/settlement/no-settlement with the City.  Concerning i-Star and the Super Block, one of the biggest things to happen to Long Beach should not have been rammed through in a rushed, under the radar process, with no explanations or even attempts at pretending to care for the opinions of the citizens of LB.  Even a Pollyanna might wonder if the process was impacted by the fact that an important member of the LBD Committee is a lawyer whose law firm counts i-Star as a client, but the Council members did not seem to care that such connections could raise an eyebrow.  Ouch.

And now, on the heels of that, we come to learn that SeaPointe developer Haberman and the City are in a bit of a mix-up regarding further development near the SeaPointe Tower (by Lincoln Blvd), including a very recently signed settlement agreement apparently allowing Haberman to seek Zoning Board approval of a variance for two 19-story towers. The settlement was signed for the City by Corey Klein (now running for City Judge), but he apparently revoked it a day later and now Haberman is upping the $50 million he wants from the City for his pain and suffering over the years (allegedly as the result of cronyism).  And the City has hired new bigshot lawyers and is being mum on the whole thing, except for Mr. Eramo, who sent an unsolicited blurb to SBTC saying he would never support 19 story towers.  Yet, it appears that there was background music on the Haberman affair all the while the i-Star matter was being jammed through.  From the Council and Zoning Board meetings at the time one would have no idea though.

What were the City Council members thinking?  What are they thinking now?  We’ll watch this one….


This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to i-Star Variance; Lincoln/SeaPointe

  1. Fred says:

    Right on! See article in today’s Long Beach Herald about variance requested in Walks by a developer using Zapson’s law firm.

  2. Sum Ting Wong says:

    we need to expose all the conflicts of interest regarding Zapson’s law firm and business in the City of Long Beach. This seems to be happening everywhere

  3. beachmom says:

    Just more of nonsense controlled by people behind the curtain. board of ed. here is no different. Not more than 5 to 10 people ever go to council or board of ed meetings. How will anything change?

  4. longbeacher says:

    unfortunately most residents are too oblivious/busy to realize what is happening to their city.. until its too late. what a mess

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s